ETFs, Mutual Funds, and CEFs
Exchange traded funds (ETFs), mutual funds, and close-ended funds (CEFs) are all different types of pooled investment securities. While all three provide investors with diversification and professional management, their operational mechanisms differ. This article will compare ETFs, mutual funds, and CEFs, focusing on structure, pricing, liquidity, costs, and investor suitability.
What is an ETF?
An ETF is a basket of securities that tracks an underlying index. They are listed on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold through the trading day at market-determined prices, just like single stocks.
One defining feature of ETFs is their creation and redemption of shares mechanism. Large institutional entities called authorized participants (APs) exchange baskets of underlying securities for ETF shares, or vice versa, to help keep the ETF’s market price aligned with its net asset value (NAV). For example, if the market price of the ETF is $605 but the NAV is $600, an AP can buy the underlying securities for $600 and sell them to the ETF provider in exchange for ETF shares. As the AP sells their new ETF shares to the market, supply will increase and push the market price of the ETF down and closer to equilibrium with its NAV.
Furthermore, ETFs can be managed actively or passively, though recently, actively managed ETFs have become quite popular. Actively managed ETFs aim to outperform the market through extensive research, security selection, and market timing, while passively managed ETFs typically track an index. Actively managed ETF fees are generally higher than passively managed ETFs but remain lower than those of mutual funds.
What is a Mutual Fund?
Mutual funds are open-ended investment vehicles that issue and redeem shares directly with investors. They are not traded on exchanges, and all transactions occur at the fund’s NAV, which is calculated once per day after the market closes.
Due to their open-ended structure, mutual funds continuously adjust the number of shares outstanding in response to investor demand. When investors contribute capital, new shares are created, and when investors redeem shares, shares are eliminated. This mechanism ensures that all transactions occur at the mutual fund’s NAV but also contributes to higher managerial oversight. Fund managers must constantly buy and sell assets to accommodate incoming and exiting investors, influencing fees and expense ratios to be relatively high.
Mutual funds can be either passively or actively managed. Naturally, actively managed mutual funds have higher fees and expenses than those managed passively.
One notable limitation of mutual funds is their relative lack of liquidity. Since transactions occur only once per day, investors are unable to act swiftly upon intraday market movements.
What is a Close-Ended Fund (CEF)*?
The fundamentals of CEFs capital structure differ from both ETFs and mutual funds. CEFs raise a fixed amount of capital through an initial public offering and do not subsequently issue or redeem shares. Instead, their shares are traded on stock exchanges in the secondary market.
Since CEFs don’t offer redemptions at NAV or implement an AP mechanism like ETFs, their market prices are determined wholly from supply and demand. Thus, they frequently trade at premiums or discounts to their NAV. As returns depend not only on performance of underlying assets but also changes in market valuation of the fund, an additional layer of complexity is introduced to investors.
Additionally, CEFs often use leverage to enhance returns, creating the potential to amplify gains, but also increasing risk. It is common that CEFs focus on income-generating strategies such as investing in bonds or dividend-paying equities.
Comparison
One major difference between the three involves their pricing mechanisms. ETFs depend on arbitrage to keep their market prices aligned with their NAV, mutual funds transact solely at their NAV, and CEFs are subject to market forces than can cause deviations between their market price and NAV.
Liquidity represents another point of differentiation. ETFs and CEFs can be traded at any time during a trading day. However, mutual funds can only be traded once at the end of each trading day, proving suboptimal for short-term trading strategies.
Cost structures also vary across these vehicles. ETFs generally offer the lowest expense ratios due to their passive management and operational efficiencies. Mutual funds, particularly those that are actively managed, tend to have higher fees. Closed-end funds occupy a middle ground but may incur additional costs related to leverage.
Lasty, all three structures have different tax implications . ETFs use an in-kind creation and redemption process, allowing them to avoid selling securities internally, reducing taxable capital gains distributions. When investors need to redeem shares in a mutual fund, the fund may need to sell securities, triggering capital gains that are distributed to all shareholders, even if you didn’t sell anything. Over time, mutual funds typically incur higher tax liabilities than ETFs. CEF distributions often include ordinary income, capital gains, and return of capital (ROC), making them less tax efficient than ETFs and potentially mutual funds.
Considerations for Investors
US investors should take note that investing in ETFs, mutuals funds, and CEFs domiciled outside of the US can incur punitive tax liabilities. The vast majority of ETFs and mutual funds domiciled in Europe fall under the regulatory wrapper of UCITS, a framework that governs how funds must operate. For a US investor, generally, any fund domiciled outside of the US is classified as a Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC), an investment vehicle that incurs punitive tax liabilities. Thus, UCITS ETFs and mutual funds are classified as PFICs, meaning US investors should likely avoid UCITs. European CEFs generally cannot be UCITS, though they can be classified as PFICs.
The choice between ETFs, mutual funds, and CEFs depends primarily on investor preferences and objectives. ETFs are well suited to investors who prioritize low costs, transparency, and trading flexibility. Mutual funds may appeal to investors who value simplicity and are solely focused on long-term investment strategies. Closed-end funds may attract investors seeking higher income or opportunities arising from price discounts, but they require a greater tolerance for complexity and risk. For more information on the distinction between these three pooled investment vehicles, please reach out to one of our wealth managers.
*Note that this description refers only to publicly listed CEFs.
Sources:
https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/etf-insights/tax-efficiency-of-etfs/
https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/investment-products/closed-end-funds/cefs-mutual-funds-etfs
https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/why-active-etfs-are-gaining-momentum-as-investors-seek-new-solutions
This material is intended for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. Additionally, you should consult with your Financial Advisor, Tax Advisor, or Attorney on your specific situation. The views expressed in the material are that of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of any market, regulatory body, State or Federal Agency, or Association. All efforts have been made to report or share true and accurate information. However, the information may become materially outdated or otherwise rendered incorrect due to subsequent new research or other changes, without notice. The author nor the firm are able to always verify the content from third-party sources. For additional information about the firm, please visit the MAS Website at https://www.mas.gov.sg/ and the SEC Website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. For a copy of the firm's ADV Part 2 Brochure, please contact us at info@avriowealth.com.